Trading glossary

Risk-reward ratio

By the PatternX team · Published

Definition

The risk-reward ratio compares what a trade could lose if its stop is hit with what it could gain if its target is reached. Written as reward:risk, a value of 2 means the target is twice as far from the entry as the stop.

Also called: reward:risk

How it's calculated

Reward:risk = |target − entry| ÷ |entry − stop|

Some traders write it the other way round, as risk:reward ("1:2"). The meaning is the same, so check which convention a tool uses before comparing numbers.

The ratio sets the share of trades a strategy must win just to break even, before costs:

Break-even win rate = 1 ÷ (1 + reward:risk)

Reward:riskBreak-even win rate
150%
233.3%
325%

These figures are arithmetic, not predictions.

Why it matters

A high ratio doesn't make a trade good by itself, because distant targets are reached less often than near ones. The ratio only means something next to a realistic estimate of how often the target is hit. Costs work against it too: the spread and slippage shrink the reward and enlarge the risk on every trade.

Example

For example, a hypothetical long at $40.00 with a stop-loss at $38.50 (risk $1.50) and a target at $43.00 (reward $3.00) has a reward:risk of 2. If the entry fills at $40.10 and the stop later fills at $38.40, the real risk was $1.70 against $2.90 of remaining reward, a ratio of about 1.7.

Common mistakes

  • Pushing the target further out to make the ratio look acceptable.
  • Ignoring that a stop can fill beyond its level in a gap.
  • Comparing numbers across tools that use opposite conventions.

How PatternX uses it

PatternX requires a reward:risk of at least 1 on its chart-pattern signals. When a pattern is detected, the stop is the tighter of your stop-loss setting and the pattern's stop, and the target is the nearer of your take-profit setting and the pattern's measured move; if the result is below 1, the setup is dropped. Elite users can require a higher minimum through the optional Elite risk filters. See risk controls.

Related reading